Kolaborasi Gen Z dengan Aktivisme Digital Hijau pada Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20961/imscs.v3i2.1139Keywords:
Generasi Z, Aktivisme Digital Hijau, Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, Kewarganegaraan Digital, Pembelajaran OtentikAbstract
The issue of environmental sustainability and climate change is a pressing global challenge, and Generation Z, as digital natives, are at the forefront through Green Digital Activism (GDA). This study aims to identify the dominant forms of Gen Z collaboration in GDA and analyze the potential and challenges of its integration as a transformative learning approach in Citizenship Education (CE). The method used is a qualitative approach with an embedded single-case study design. Data were collected through digital content analysis (Instagram, X, TikTok), in-depth interviews with digital activists, CE educators, and experts/academics, and Focus Group Discussions (FGD) for model formulation. The findings identified three dominant forms of Gen Z collaboration in GDA: Visual Education Content Production (short videos/infographics), Online-to-Offline Collective Action Mobilization, and Crowdsourcing/Crowdfunding for environmental issues. The integration of GDA has strong potential to enhance Digital Civic Participation and strengthen students’ Civic Knowledge and Civic Skills, confirming a shift from slacktivism to connective action. However, this integration is hampered by Pedagogical-Curriculum Challenges (lack of specific GDA project-based learning models and difficulty in measuring competencies) and Technical-Infrastructure Challenges (digital gaps and minimal teacher training). The conclusion emphasizes that GDA can be an authentic and transformative learning medium in CE, but it requires a systematic pedagogical framework. The novelty of this research lies in developing a conceptual model that systematically bridges Gen Z's digital proficiency, their GDA ethos, and the core objectives of CE to create active and environmentally conscious citizens.
References
Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Polity Press.
Dobson, A. (2017). Green citizenship and beyond: Radical politics and the ethics of sustainability. Political Studies, 65(1), 1–18.
Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2017). The adaptation of activism to the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 98(2), 481–496.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.; M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Continuum.
Kerr, D. (2018). Global citizenship education: Theoretical and curricular perspectives. Council of Europe Publishing.
Lai, J. W., & Li, M. (2021). The role of technology in environmental education: A systematic review. Environmental Education Research, 27(10), 1545–1565.
Lin, K. Y., & Chen, Y. R. (2020). Exploring factors influencing the success of environmental crowdfunding projects. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63(5), 896–914.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation. MIT Press.
O’Meara, J. (2022). Generation Z green advocacy: Digital participation and climate change politics. Journal of Youth Studies, 25(8), 1010–1025.
Poell, T. (2023). Digital activism and the challenges of platform governance. International Journal of Communication, 17, 2392–2410.
Rieck, K. (2018). The logic of connective action in environmental protest. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1438–1457.
Segerberg, A., & Bennett, W. L. (2011). Social media and the organization of collective action: Using Twitter to explore the street protests for democracy in Egypt. Communication Review, 14(3), 227–243.
Sheehan, M. G. (2021). Digital natives, digital activists: Generation Z and climate change activism on social media. Journal of Youth Studies, 24(5), 650–667.
Tandoc, E. C., Jr., & Dizon, F. J. (2020). Social media and political participation: A study of Generation Z in Southeast Asia. Telematics and Informatics, 50, 101370.
United Nations Environment Programme. (2022). Emissions Gap Report 2022: The closing window—Climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies. UNEP.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies: Conference Series

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

