Kesan Gaya Kepimpinan terhadap Tahap Stres dalam Kalangan Guru Sekolah Rendah di Daerah Keramat, Kuala Lumpur

Authors

  • Rosni binti Ab Rani Faculty Of Education And Liberal Studies (FOELS), City University Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20961/imscs.v3i2.1148

Keywords:

kepimpinan transformasional, tekanan kerja guru, sekolah rendah, pengetua, kesejahteraan guru, SPSS

Abstract

Work-related stress among teachers is a significant issue within the education system, particularly in urban areas that face heavy workloads and high administrative demands. School leadership has been identified as an important organizational factor with the potential to influence teachers’ levels of work stress. This study aims to identify the level of principals’ transformational leadership, the level of teachers’ work stress, and to examine the relationship and influence of transformational leadership on the work stress of primary school teachers in the Keramat District, Kuala Lumpur. This study employed a quantitative approach using a survey research design. A total of 56 primary school teachers were selected as respondents through purposive sampling. The research instruments consisted of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) to measure transformational leadership and the Teacher Stress Inventory (TSI) to measure teachers’ work stress. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and simple linear regression. The findings indicate that the level of principals’ transformational leadership practices is high, while the level of teachers’ work stress is moderate. Correlation analysis reveals a significant negative relationship between transformational leadership and teachers’ work stress (r = −0.412, p < 0.01). Regression analysis further shows that transformational leadership is a significant predictor of teachers’ work stress, accounting for 16.9% of the variance. In conclusion, principals’ transformational leadership plays an important role in reducing teachers’ work stress and contributes to the creation of a more supportive and positive school environment.

References

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications.

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Mind Garden.

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.

Day, C., & Leithwood, K. (Eds.). (2007). Successful principal leadership in times of change: An international perspective. Springer.

Dorman, J. P. (2003). Relationship between school and classroom environment and teacher burnout: A LISREL analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 6(2), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023296126723

Dorman, J. P. (2003). Teacher Stress Inventory (TSI). Educational Research Instruments.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013–2025. KPM.

Kyriacou, C. (2001). Teacher stress: Directions for future research. Educational Review, 53(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910120033628

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). Transformational leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 31–43). SAGE Publications.

Nor Safwan Saiful Hizan, & Shazaitul Azreen Rodzalan. (2020). Tekanan kerja dan kepuasan kerja dalam kalangan guru di Malaysia. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 7(2), 34–45.

Downloads

Published

29-12-2025