Integration of Social Capital and Humanistic Approaches in Reproductive Health Education (Teenagers with Down Syndrome in Special Schools)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20961/imscs.v3i2.1174Keywords:
social capital, humanistic approach, reproductive health, Down Syndrome, special educationAbstract
This article analyzes how the integration of social capital and the humanistic approach contributes to reproductive health education for adolescents with Down Syndrome in Special Schools (SLB). This issue is critical because reproductive education for adolescents with intellectual disabilities is still rarely provided systematically, although their needs increase during puberty and their vulnerability to social risks remains high. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach involving 13 participants, consisting of five students with Down Syndrome, three teachers, and five parents. Data were collected through observations, in-depth interviews, and document analysis, and were thematically analyzed to identify patterns of social support and the application of humanistic practices in the learning process. The findings reveal that social capital,reflected in trust between teachers and parents, shared norms, and the school’s social networks, plays an essential role in creating a safe environment for addressing sensitive reproductive topics. Meanwhile, the humanistic approach practiced by teachers, including empathy, unconditional acceptance, and open communication, helps students understand their bodies, personal boundaries, and appropriate social behavior. The integration of these two approaches enhances learning comfort, strengthens students’ self-awareness, and increases parental involvement in guiding reproductive education at home. These findings highlight the importance of a community-based and humanistic reproductive education model in SLB settings.
References
Ahmad, M., & Yunus, F. W. (2024). Professional perspectives on sex education towards children with disabilities: Addressing social exclusion. Perspektif Pendidikan dan Sosial, 12(1), 45–60.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
Buckley, S., & Bird, G. (2000). Improving the speech and language skills of children with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Educational Trust.
Chua, L. Y., & Tan, S. Y. (2024). Towards inclusive sexual and reproductive health education for children with intellectual disabilities in Sarawak, Malaysia. EAI Endorsed Transactions on e-Learning, 10(1), 1–9.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
Cunningham, C. (2006). Down syndrome: An introduction for parents and carers. Souvenir Press.
Fadhilah, R., & Rahmat, H. (2024). Humanizing learning: Implementing the humanistic approach in inclusive education at primary schools. Hijri Journal of Inclusive Education, 4(2), 77–90.
Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Pullen, P. C. (2015). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education (12th ed.). Pearson.
Islam, M. I., et al. (2022). Influence of education on sexual and reproductive health service utilisation for persons with disabilities in Bangladesh: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study. Reproductive Health, 19(1), 1–14.
Kergoat, Y., Vilbrod, A., & Gaudreau, L. (2023). Sexual and reproductive health education for youth with intellectual disabilities: A mixed methods study of professionals’ practices and needs. Prevention Science, 24(3), 402–415.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. Harper & Row.
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). Van Nostrand.
Ministry of Education and Culture of Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia tentang Perlindungan Anak. Kemendikbud.
Noddings, N. (2005). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
Rogers, C. R., & Freiberg, H. J. (1994). Freedom to learn (3rd ed.). Merrill.
Santrock, J. W. (2019). Life-span development (17th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
UNESCO. (2018). International technical guidance on sexuality education: An evidence-informed approach. UNESCO Publishing.
UNICEF. (2013). The state of the world’s children: Children with disabilities. UNICEF.
WHO. (2010). Standards for sexuality education in Europe: A framework for policymakers, educators and health authorities. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.
WHO. (2018). WHO recommendations on adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights. World Health Organization.
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.225
Yusuf, M. (2018). Pendidikan inklusif dan perlindungan anak. UNS Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies: Conference Series

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

