Inclusive Civic Participation through Differentiated Democratic Learning: Evidence from SMP IT An-Nida' Lubuklinggau
Keywords:
inclusive civic participation, differentiated democratic learning, civic educationAbstract
Democratic participation among young people requires learning environments that accommodate diverse interests, abilities, and forms of engagement. However, civic education practices often emphasize leadership positions and voting activities, providing limited opportunities for broader student participation. This study explores how differentiated democratic learning fosters inclusive civic participation among students at SMPIT An-Nida’ Lubuklinggau, Indonesia. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through participant observation, documentation, and reflective records generated during a school-based democratic learning program known as Pesta Demokrasi An-Nida’. The program engaged students in various democratic roles, including election candidates, political party members, election committee members, supervisory committee members, media campaign teams, coding teams, and voters. The findings indicate that differentiated democratic learning created multiple pathways for participation, enabling students with diverse interests and competencies to contribute meaningfully to democratic processes. Students developed civic competencies such as leadership, collaboration, communication, responsibility, and digital participation through authentic democratic experiences. Furthermore, the availability of diverse roles encouraged broader student engagement by recognizing different strengths and forms of contribution. The study suggests that inclusive civic participation can be strengthened when democratic education moves beyond conventional voting and leadership activities to embrace varied forms of student involvement. These findings contribute to the discourse on inclusive citizenship and youth engagement while supporting the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals 4 and 16 through innovative civic education practices.
References
Alscher, P., Ludewig, U., & McElvany, N. (2022). Civic education, teaching quality and students' willingness to participate in political and civic life: Political interest and knowledge as mediators. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51(10), 1886–1900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01639-9
Blevins, B., LeCompte, K., & Wells, S. (2016). Innovations in civic education: Developing civic agency through action civics. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(4), 542–564. https://doi.org
Borhan, H. (2025). Civic education as a pathway to inclusive societies: Exploring the role of education in fostering civic and social engagement. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 326. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org
Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017). Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org
Castro, A. J., Fozi, A., Hung, C.-Y., Etoh, M., & Bergin, C. (2025). Civic and prosocial decision-making in early adolescents. Youth, 5(2), Article 33. https://doi.org
Choi, M. (2016). A concept analysis of digital citizenship for democratic citizenship education in the internet age. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(4), 565–607. https://doi.org
Choi, M., Glassman, M., & Cristol, D. (2017). What it means to be a citizen in the internet age: Development of a reliable and valid digital citizenship scale. Computers & Education, 107, 100–112. https://doi.org
Conner, J., Mitra, D. L., Holquist, S. E., & Boat, A. (2025). How teachers' student voice practices affect student engagement and achievement: Exploring choice, receptivity, and responsiveness to student voice as moderators. Journal of Educational Change. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-024-09513-0
Geboers, E., Geijsel, F., Admiraal, W., & ten Dam, G. (2015). Review of the effects of citizenship education. Educational Research Review, 14, 158–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.001
Hoskins, B., & Janmaat, J. G. (2019). Education, democracy and inequality: Political engagement and citizenship education in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org
Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768
Kim, M., & Choi, D. (2020). Development of youth civic engagement through project-based civic learning. Sustainability, 12(11), Article 4310. https://doi.org
Knowles, R. T. (2018). Teaching who you are: Connecting teachers' civic education ideology to instructional strategies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(1), 68–109. https://doi.org
Ni, S., Geldhof, G. J., Settersten, R. A., Jr., & Tominey, S. (2025). Civic participation and meaning in life: Similarities and differences across diverse youth. Youth & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Engaging young citizens: Civic education practices in the classroom and beyond. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org
Putri, L., Efendi, N., Prananda, G., & Ayunis. (2025). Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum in differentiated learning on Civics learning outcomes of fourth grade students at SD Negeri 08 Kinali. TOFEDU: The Future of Education Journal, 4(9), 5754–5763. https://doi.org/10.61445/tofedu.v4i9.1147
Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Losito, B., Agrusti, G., Damiani, V., & Friedman, T. (2024). The International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2022 assessment framework. Springer Nature. https://doi.org
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.
